Case study

Warwickshire hospitality site reduces repeat drainage disruption with a correctly sized grease trap

This case study covers a busy hospitality kitchen in Warwickshire where repeated drainage problems were creating disruption during trading periods. The site already had a grease trap in place, but the unit was too small for the kitchen's actual grease load and the operator was relying on repeated reactive drain jetting to keep things moving.

Site snapshot

Warwickshire hospitality site cuts repeat drainage disruption

An ageing undersized grease trap was allowing repeat backups and regular drain jetting. After a properly sized upgrade, the site stopped seeing the same recurring drainage issue.

Site type
Hospitality kitchen
Location
Warwickshire
Headline issue
Repeated drainage backups during busy periods, an existing grease trap that was no longer coping properly, and rising cost from repeated reactive drain jetting.

What Actem did

The practical next step on site

ACTEM surveyed the site, identified that the existing unit was undersized and showing signs of age, then designed a more practical upgrade around the kitchen layout, sink setup and likely grease output.

After the correctly sized replacement was installed, the repeated backup issue stopped, the site no longer needed the same pattern of reactive jetting, and day-to-day operation became more stable during busy trading periods.

The problem on site

What needed sorting

  • Drainage problems were recurring during busy service periods rather than appearing as a one-off issue.
  • The existing grease trap was in place but was too small for the kitchen's actual grease output.
  • The unit was showing signs of age and leakage, which reduced confidence in the setup.
  • The operator had fallen into an expensive reactive cycle of repeated drain jetting just to keep the site operational.
  • Drainage disruption was affecting external service areas and reducing usable customer space.

Work carried out

How Actem approached it

  • Surveyed the site and reviewed the kitchen layout, sink usage and likely grease load.
  • Confirmed that the existing grease trap was undersized for normal trading conditions.
  • Removed the ageing undersized unit and supplied a correctly sized replacement.
  • Installed a 100-litre grease trap to the double-bowl sink arrangement.
  • Carried out flow and access checks and gave practical operating guidance to site staff.

Outcome

What changed afterwards

This is the part most operators care about: what improved on site, what became clearer, and what the next step looked like after the initial work.

No further reports of drain backing up after installation.
No repeat drain jetting required over the following 12 months.
Lower ongoing drainage maintenance cost compared with the previous reactive approach.
Outdoor customer areas remained usable instead of being disrupted by repeated wastewater issues.
The site later had added confidence that its grease-management arrangement was in a much stronger position for compliance checks.

Start with a conversation

Need help with a similar kitchen or site?

If your site has similar pressure points, contact Actem and talk through what is already in place, what is going wrong and what the most practical next step looks like.